Javascript has two equality operators, == and === (and corresponding inequality operators != and !==). Most beginner javascript developers use either ==, as they don’t yet know about ===, or blindly use === for every comparison because they heard once, somewhere, that that was what you should do in javascript;¬†without really understanding the differences between the two.

The difference between == and === are simple: == uses ‘type coercion’, which means that it can attempt to match two objects of different class, while === compares against both value and type. For example,

"1" == 1 // true


"1" === 1 // false

since javascript’s == comparison converts the string “1″ to a number, and then matches, whilst the === recognises that the string literal is not equivalent to the number. The results of == seem ok for this example, but it’s type conversions can produce some other unexpected results. for example:

"0" == false // true
"0" === false // false

1 == true // true
1 === true // false

undefined == null // true
undefined === null // false

On the whole it is advisable to use === for comparisons, but knowing the difference means that sometimes we can use this type coercion to our advantage. Just be sure to be smart about it, and preferably explain your reasoning in a short comment so as not to confuse others!

Ok so I puzzled out what was wrong, and it was pretty damn annoying! It seems that the startup order was set for the web app to run before the scheduler. This meant that when the web app initialised, it looked to subscribe to the scheduler but, as the scheduler was not yet initialised, simply dropped the subscription. This meant that subsequent calls to Bus.Instance.Publish(…) did squat.

Two quick fixes:

1. Make sure the scheduler always starts up before the web app
2. Call the scheduler’s end point directly, using:

   .GetEndpoint(new Uri("msmq://localhost/scheduler_queue"))
   .Send(new UpdatedScheduledTask()
       ScheduledTaskId = task.Id,
       Crontag = task.Crontag

Note: probably not the best idea to hard code the uri, add it to your config instead!

So I’m currently writing a command line task scheduler so users can get various reports emailed to them at specific times. In order that the scheduler was not continuously polling the database to check for new scheduled tasks, I needed to be able to communicate from the web app to the scheduler whenever a new task was created/a task was edited, and decided to use Mass Transit for this. Mass Transit is a really easy way to set up service bus implementation, used to pass messages between parts of the system running as different processes/on different machines.

For whatever reason, I really love asynchronous stuff, it just seems so cool. So when I update a scheduled task and I see the change reflected in my command line app its pretty exciting.

When I come in to work the next day, and it doesn’t work anymore despite no code changes, it’s a real pain in the ass…